The airline's income comes from flights and from tickets purchased by passengers. Therefore, the airline is responsible for everything from passenger check-in and check-in boarding passes on the plane to sending passengers off the plane.
The airport's revenue comes from airlines, which provide apron for aircraft takeoff, landing, taxiing and parking, provide boarding and bridge delivery, and provide terminals for passengers to place, collect luggage and wait for planes.
These will be charged corresponding fees to the airline.
Therefore, the returns of the two are closely related, one prospers and one loses.
Our relationship between Cathay Pacific and the airport says that the relationship between tenants and landlords does not seem to be accurate enough, and it is more like the relationship between shopping malls and merchants.The airport is set up and the company is performing.I have always been working happily before, but now I suddenly come here. I don’t understand what your airport means?
The relationship between the airport and the airline is indeed similar to what Ms. Lin said, but the location of the airport is limited, the apron is so large that it can only withstand so many passenger planes, but the proportion of passengers is roughly fixed.
Now Cathay Pacific has been reorganized, and the passenger composition has been adjusted with the relevant routes. You can no longer take over overseas passengers or passengers flying international routes as before. Other airlines can help share the burden, but there are only so many space flights. If you don’t give up your location, how can you meet the needs of passengers?
This is a very realistic and difficult problem. The problem is that there is a mobile gap of more than 100,000 every day. Airports are facing huge pressure, and we must find a way to solve it.
So the solution is to let us out the location?Ten more parking spaces must be given out?
Cathay Pacific has a total of 200 passenger planes, but because it is necessary to fly everywhere, it is impossible to park all passenger planes at the Hong Kong International Airport, which has only 182 parking spaces in total. However, it has almost rented 70 parking spaces, which means that it can park up to 70 aircraft at the same time.
Don’t underestimate these parking spaces. They are actually very popular, and they can even seriously affect the use rate and turnover rate of the aircraft. The number of parking spaces that are missing at once is equivalent to at least 30 flights per day, or even more.
The airport's daily shutdown limit is said to be able to carry out up to 10 turnovers. Calculated in this way, it is equivalent to reducing 100 shifts per in and out, which is equivalent to reducing revenue by 15% when the cost and expenses remain unchanged. The total revenue in 2018 is only 107 billion. After deducting some other revenue, only counting ticketing, it is almost reduced by about 13 billion.
Cathay Pacific's profits at its peak did not exceed 3 billion, so it is conceivable how big the impact is.
Simply put, the steps are too big and the operation cost itself is far beyond your current ability to bear, and it directly turns into a big bloodletting. It is to use such a huge loss to make you constantly transfusion blood to Cathay, and finally have to admit compensation and leave the market, which is very insidious.
However, others have very good reasons. Because your current European and American international business has declined a lot, passengers with this need cannot board the plane, which has had a huge impact on the operation and reputation of the airport. Therefore, you must give up and give such convenience. This is not a breach of the airport, but from the perspective of Hong Kong's economic development, I hope you make reasonable concessions.
This is also an open conspiracy, and Lin Wanyu really didn't know how to resolve it for a while.
Zhang Weihao, who received the call, called the current No. 1 person directly, and had no other requirements. If Cathay Pacific really wants to make sacrifices, it is OK, then give the license and land. They plan to build their own airport and spend 10-30 billion on the new airport.
The first brother didn't know about this at first, but after understanding it, he figured out what was going on, and the same was true for his reply.
No matter how you fight, you have to make a concession, and you can sacrifice short-term interests, but you have to make concessions for the future. At that time, a second airport will appear in Hong Kong. Some important customers nowadays will likely cooperate with the new airport, especially domestic and pan-Asia-Pacific airlines.
It takes 4-5 years to build an airport, and it can be done in about 3 years if it is faster and not so large.
If you just repair part of it first, and continue to expand while putting it into use, it can be done in 2 years. It is just supplied to Cathay Pacific and can be repaired in as early as two years.
Such a reply naturally gave the group of people behind him a headache. When they encountered a rich and willful weirdo, they were helpless, so they finally gave up the suggestion of letting Cathay Pacific give up the parking space and adjusted the flights of other airlines.
After all, there is a solution. Cathay Pacific's business volume in Europe and the United States has declined, but you can distribute these flights and business to other contracted airlines, and then reduce the business volume and follow-up of these airlines in the Pan Asia-Pacific region. Wouldn't this have no impact?
It can even increase the revenue of those airlines. To put it bluntly, this is deliberately causing trouble, trying to suppress Cathay Pacific and bleed wildly.
Under normal circumstances, it is almost impossible to solve such a conspiracy, but who is Zhang Weihao? At worst, I can spend 20 to 30 billion yuan to lose money, and then spend 20 to 30 billion yuan to build a second airport that belongs entirely to me. At that time, I will make all the capital and profits back, and I will directly run you into bankruptcy.
Most people do not have such courage and strength, but no one dares to doubt Zhang Weihao. Tens of billions are like playing, and they can earn money in a minute. These people dare not bet. Once they bet wrong, they can't just apologize and admit their mistakes. At that time, many people will really lose a lot of money.
Not to mention anything else, the other airlines will not agree. Who told them not to have such strength? Cathay Pacific is really there. If Cathay Pacific really needs its own airport, they will definitely cry to death.
The costs are different. At worst, others can dump at a low price. Let’s kill all of them first.
This is how Korean Air plays, and Lion Air, which is one of the few aviation giants with airports, so they are the absolute overlords of their respective territories. They are ranked among the top ten aviation giants in the world with the power of one city, which has successfully counterattacked many aviation giants in Britain, the United States, France and Japan.
The airport's revenue comes from airlines, which provide apron for aircraft takeoff, landing, taxiing and parking, provide boarding and bridge delivery, and provide terminals for passengers to place, collect luggage and wait for planes.
These will be charged corresponding fees to the airline.
Therefore, the returns of the two are closely related, one prospers and one loses.
Our relationship between Cathay Pacific and the airport says that the relationship between tenants and landlords does not seem to be accurate enough, and it is more like the relationship between shopping malls and merchants.The airport is set up and the company is performing.I have always been working happily before, but now I suddenly come here. I don’t understand what your airport means?
The relationship between the airport and the airline is indeed similar to what Ms. Lin said, but the location of the airport is limited, the apron is so large that it can only withstand so many passenger planes, but the proportion of passengers is roughly fixed.
Now Cathay Pacific has been reorganized, and the passenger composition has been adjusted with the relevant routes. You can no longer take over overseas passengers or passengers flying international routes as before. Other airlines can help share the burden, but there are only so many space flights. If you don’t give up your location, how can you meet the needs of passengers?
This is a very realistic and difficult problem. The problem is that there is a mobile gap of more than 100,000 every day. Airports are facing huge pressure, and we must find a way to solve it.
So the solution is to let us out the location?Ten more parking spaces must be given out?
Cathay Pacific has a total of 200 passenger planes, but because it is necessary to fly everywhere, it is impossible to park all passenger planes at the Hong Kong International Airport, which has only 182 parking spaces in total. However, it has almost rented 70 parking spaces, which means that it can park up to 70 aircraft at the same time.
Don’t underestimate these parking spaces. They are actually very popular, and they can even seriously affect the use rate and turnover rate of the aircraft. The number of parking spaces that are missing at once is equivalent to at least 30 flights per day, or even more.
The airport's daily shutdown limit is said to be able to carry out up to 10 turnovers. Calculated in this way, it is equivalent to reducing 100 shifts per in and out, which is equivalent to reducing revenue by 15% when the cost and expenses remain unchanged. The total revenue in 2018 is only 107 billion. After deducting some other revenue, only counting ticketing, it is almost reduced by about 13 billion.
Cathay Pacific's profits at its peak did not exceed 3 billion, so it is conceivable how big the impact is.
Simply put, the steps are too big and the operation cost itself is far beyond your current ability to bear, and it directly turns into a big bloodletting. It is to use such a huge loss to make you constantly transfusion blood to Cathay, and finally have to admit compensation and leave the market, which is very insidious.
However, others have very good reasons. Because your current European and American international business has declined a lot, passengers with this need cannot board the plane, which has had a huge impact on the operation and reputation of the airport. Therefore, you must give up and give such convenience. This is not a breach of the airport, but from the perspective of Hong Kong's economic development, I hope you make reasonable concessions.
This is also an open conspiracy, and Lin Wanyu really didn't know how to resolve it for a while.
Zhang Weihao, who received the call, called the current No. 1 person directly, and had no other requirements. If Cathay Pacific really wants to make sacrifices, it is OK, then give the license and land. They plan to build their own airport and spend 10-30 billion on the new airport.
The first brother didn't know about this at first, but after understanding it, he figured out what was going on, and the same was true for his reply.
No matter how you fight, you have to make a concession, and you can sacrifice short-term interests, but you have to make concessions for the future. At that time, a second airport will appear in Hong Kong. Some important customers nowadays will likely cooperate with the new airport, especially domestic and pan-Asia-Pacific airlines.
It takes 4-5 years to build an airport, and it can be done in about 3 years if it is faster and not so large.
If you just repair part of it first, and continue to expand while putting it into use, it can be done in 2 years. It is just supplied to Cathay Pacific and can be repaired in as early as two years.
Such a reply naturally gave the group of people behind him a headache. When they encountered a rich and willful weirdo, they were helpless, so they finally gave up the suggestion of letting Cathay Pacific give up the parking space and adjusted the flights of other airlines.
After all, there is a solution. Cathay Pacific's business volume in Europe and the United States has declined, but you can distribute these flights and business to other contracted airlines, and then reduce the business volume and follow-up of these airlines in the Pan Asia-Pacific region. Wouldn't this have no impact?
It can even increase the revenue of those airlines. To put it bluntly, this is deliberately causing trouble, trying to suppress Cathay Pacific and bleed wildly.
Under normal circumstances, it is almost impossible to solve such a conspiracy, but who is Zhang Weihao? At worst, I can spend 20 to 30 billion yuan to lose money, and then spend 20 to 30 billion yuan to build a second airport that belongs entirely to me. At that time, I will make all the capital and profits back, and I will directly run you into bankruptcy.
Most people do not have such courage and strength, but no one dares to doubt Zhang Weihao. Tens of billions are like playing, and they can earn money in a minute. These people dare not bet. Once they bet wrong, they can't just apologize and admit their mistakes. At that time, many people will really lose a lot of money.
Not to mention anything else, the other airlines will not agree. Who told them not to have such strength? Cathay Pacific is really there. If Cathay Pacific really needs its own airport, they will definitely cry to death.
The costs are different. At worst, others can dump at a low price. Let’s kill all of them first.
This is how Korean Air plays, and Lion Air, which is one of the few aviation giants with airports, so they are the absolute overlords of their respective territories. They are ranked among the top ten aviation giants in the world with the power of one city, which has successfully counterattacked many aviation giants in Britain, the United States, France and Japan.