With the release of the movie, more and more people watched the movie, and many film reviews and related discussions have quickly become hot topics. Among them, whether Tan Mingming would be sentenced to death if he did not kill the police. If Tan Mingming had confessed honestly and actively cooperated from the beginning, wouldn’t these tragedies not happen? Who did she harm her mother, a beautiful girl like the sky?
Is it worth sacrificing so many policemen to protect such a prisoner?
This topic after another has caused heated discussion and fierce quarrel among a large number of netizens. It can be said that such a controversial and topical movie has not appeared in China for nearly many years. It is almost a hot discussion among the whole nation. It can be said that different people have seen some of their own figures in the movie and learned a lot.
The most connotation of the relationship is the love scene that seems a bit redundant but makes countless movie fans find it interesting. A new director with a promising future fell like this, and the original little transparent new actor ended up making a big hit. Then there was no bloody love between the two, and it was useless to look at each other and smiled. It was just a simple pass by.
It has been forgotten by many people for a long time. Beijing TV, which has fallen into second-rate, has been once again been forgotten by netizens!
When I first watched "Straw Shield", I thought it was Keigo Higashino's "Wandering Blade". Although only one of the four characters is repeated, even the theme is so similar to Ah!
Later, it was discovered that the two were similar in shape but were too far away in essence. Higashino talked about the suspiciousness of procedural justice. Although the picture of Michigan Lao Yao was more intense, it was simpler than Higashino thought. He talked about the justice of procedural justice.
Why?
Start with if.
a What if Kiyomaru, who was chased by a reward, was not so guilty, or even a good person at all?
Qingmaru's character design strictly follows the principle of one center and one basic point, which is a scumbag, who is completely hopeless and embarrassed to spare him.
This design is confusing and objectively gives many extremely unprofessional killers and the shaking old man Ninagawa to act rationally.
but!
I believe that if the old man Ninagawa gives a reward of 1 billion yuan, it will also bring the effect of the whole nation's mobilization.
After all, it was the one billion Xuanhong who made Kiyomaru the public enemy, not the crime he committed.
Therefore, one of the arguments for Sanchi’s procedural justice: lynching contains too many subjective factors to make a relatively fair judgment on whether a person deserves to die.
b If the killers don't need money in urgent need
A counter evidence is provided in the movie, namely the female taxi driver.
She clearly knew how valuable Qingwan’s head was, but she was not moved.
The fundamental reason is that driving a taxi can provide her with food and clothing, and there is no need to get into prison for avenging her old man.
My mother told me: Money is not easy to make.
The uncle killer at the subway station even threatened to hold a girl hostage in order to kill Qingmaru and was essentially the same as Qingmaru.
Therefore, Sanchi's argument for procedural justice is the second: Anyone who attempts to lynch his own personal interests in essence. To put it more directly, lynching, whether it violates the law or not, is an infringement and damage to social public rights. Only by sharing the right to determine the death penalty can the personal interests be shared into the interests of the masses.
c If Kiyomaru didn’t kill Mr. Ninagawa’s granddaughter, or Mr. Ninagawa wasn’t that rich?
Regarding this, the movie also provides a counter evidence, namely Huimi's father.
They are also a little girl who was tortured, but Emi's death did not bring about such a collective carnival of the Olympics. I believe Emi's father had wanted to kill Kiyomaru countless times, but he could only obtain sufficient technical support and information resources when Kiyomaru killed Ninagawa's granddaughter. Why?
It's nothing more than money.
Therefore, the second argument of Sanchi’s argument for procedural justice: allowing individuals to have the right to lynch their rights is actually acknowledging that the rights of some individuals are higher than legal and public rights. Therefore, the right to urge punishment to the law and the group is to achieve the maximum scope of social fairness and social justice.
To sum up, the Sanchi film does prove the justice of procedural justice.
But, however, I haven't finished speaking yet.
What if Qingmaru is not sentenced to death?
Minghun taught Aocun a lesson. There is a line that is very powerful and interesting. When you mention money, it seems that all the reasons become excuses.
But there is a saying in Okumura that is also very fierce if Qingmaru can't die...
I suddenly felt that China's death penalty system was absolutely wise and powerful. If a scumbag like Qingmao doesn't die, and I will train two imitators, I'm damn!
Kiyomaru died in the movie, but according to Japan's almost deadly death penalty system, I really can't imagine it.
When Kiyomaru dared to surrender, he probably saw Japan's ambiguous attitude towards the death penalty. In the hands of the government, he might be able to leave a way out.
I have written so much about the setting and plot of "Straw Shield" is naturally because the two movies have very similar settings and plots. Director Wu also said at the beginning that the inspiration came from "Straw Shield", but I have to say that world-class movie masters are world-class movie masters. There is no intention of looking down on director Michii, but it is not on the same level.
In "I Want to Live", it is no longer just a discussion of justice in procedural justice, but rather a discussion of the privileged class and justice, and the importance of legal fairness, which is a warning to those privileged classes, not our ordinary people.
People like Tan Mingming are indeed privileged classes, and are so powerful that they can break the rules of the game and break the principle of credibility and fairness that the law should have. But is this really a good thing?
Compared with the Yang family, who are also rich, Tan Mingming is naturally much stronger. Even the old couple in the Yang family should run slower, or encounter a ruthless and ruthless person like Yao Jiaxin. Maybe they should start first. If I hit your son to death, I will destroy your whole family.
But when you walk by the river often, you can’t wet your shoes. If you don’t take the legal rules seriously, one day you will also encounter someone who doesn’t take the legal rules seriously and seek revenge on you. Since the law cannot give me fairness and justice, I can also use another way to get back my justice.
This is actually a very terrible and dangerous discussion. Just when we thought Tan Mingming would be saved and completed his final self-salvation, a scene that I and all the audience could not imagine appeared. Tan Mingming turned black because of fear and pressure, abandoned all dignity and kindness, and chose to completely degenerate.
How to say it?
I never imagined that domestic movies could have such a reversal and ending, which was beyond our expectations, but I felt that it was very real, because this is human nature, so I left us a lot of thoughts and discussions. This movie is really great, and it is the best Chinese movie I have ever seen in my life, Director Wu yyds!
Finally, I have to PS, Liu Yifei in a white shirt is real, she is very beautiful, and she looks heroic. Even though she no longer has a vivid and pretty face now, she is still so beautiful.
In addition, is the relationship between Director Wu and Li Qin true?
If Director Wu really didn't make a successful counterattack, and changed his fate against the will of heaven, but was like many ordinary people, would it be the final outcome of the two of them?
I don’t know how others are. Anyway, I feel a little uncomfortable and sad. Fortunately, the reality has not developed like this, so I still want to sincerely wish them!
Is it worth sacrificing so many policemen to protect such a prisoner?
This topic after another has caused heated discussion and fierce quarrel among a large number of netizens. It can be said that such a controversial and topical movie has not appeared in China for nearly many years. It is almost a hot discussion among the whole nation. It can be said that different people have seen some of their own figures in the movie and learned a lot.
The most connotation of the relationship is the love scene that seems a bit redundant but makes countless movie fans find it interesting. A new director with a promising future fell like this, and the original little transparent new actor ended up making a big hit. Then there was no bloody love between the two, and it was useless to look at each other and smiled. It was just a simple pass by.
It has been forgotten by many people for a long time. Beijing TV, which has fallen into second-rate, has been once again been forgotten by netizens!
When I first watched "Straw Shield", I thought it was Keigo Higashino's "Wandering Blade". Although only one of the four characters is repeated, even the theme is so similar to Ah!
Later, it was discovered that the two were similar in shape but were too far away in essence. Higashino talked about the suspiciousness of procedural justice. Although the picture of Michigan Lao Yao was more intense, it was simpler than Higashino thought. He talked about the justice of procedural justice.
Why?
Start with if.
a What if Kiyomaru, who was chased by a reward, was not so guilty, or even a good person at all?
Qingmaru's character design strictly follows the principle of one center and one basic point, which is a scumbag, who is completely hopeless and embarrassed to spare him.
This design is confusing and objectively gives many extremely unprofessional killers and the shaking old man Ninagawa to act rationally.
but!
I believe that if the old man Ninagawa gives a reward of 1 billion yuan, it will also bring the effect of the whole nation's mobilization.
After all, it was the one billion Xuanhong who made Kiyomaru the public enemy, not the crime he committed.
Therefore, one of the arguments for Sanchi’s procedural justice: lynching contains too many subjective factors to make a relatively fair judgment on whether a person deserves to die.
b If the killers don't need money in urgent need
A counter evidence is provided in the movie, namely the female taxi driver.
She clearly knew how valuable Qingwan’s head was, but she was not moved.
The fundamental reason is that driving a taxi can provide her with food and clothing, and there is no need to get into prison for avenging her old man.
My mother told me: Money is not easy to make.
The uncle killer at the subway station even threatened to hold a girl hostage in order to kill Qingmaru and was essentially the same as Qingmaru.
Therefore, Sanchi's argument for procedural justice is the second: Anyone who attempts to lynch his own personal interests in essence. To put it more directly, lynching, whether it violates the law or not, is an infringement and damage to social public rights. Only by sharing the right to determine the death penalty can the personal interests be shared into the interests of the masses.
c If Kiyomaru didn’t kill Mr. Ninagawa’s granddaughter, or Mr. Ninagawa wasn’t that rich?
Regarding this, the movie also provides a counter evidence, namely Huimi's father.
They are also a little girl who was tortured, but Emi's death did not bring about such a collective carnival of the Olympics. I believe Emi's father had wanted to kill Kiyomaru countless times, but he could only obtain sufficient technical support and information resources when Kiyomaru killed Ninagawa's granddaughter. Why?
It's nothing more than money.
Therefore, the second argument of Sanchi’s argument for procedural justice: allowing individuals to have the right to lynch their rights is actually acknowledging that the rights of some individuals are higher than legal and public rights. Therefore, the right to urge punishment to the law and the group is to achieve the maximum scope of social fairness and social justice.
To sum up, the Sanchi film does prove the justice of procedural justice.
But, however, I haven't finished speaking yet.
What if Qingmaru is not sentenced to death?
Minghun taught Aocun a lesson. There is a line that is very powerful and interesting. When you mention money, it seems that all the reasons become excuses.
But there is a saying in Okumura that is also very fierce if Qingmaru can't die...
I suddenly felt that China's death penalty system was absolutely wise and powerful. If a scumbag like Qingmao doesn't die, and I will train two imitators, I'm damn!
Kiyomaru died in the movie, but according to Japan's almost deadly death penalty system, I really can't imagine it.
When Kiyomaru dared to surrender, he probably saw Japan's ambiguous attitude towards the death penalty. In the hands of the government, he might be able to leave a way out.
I have written so much about the setting and plot of "Straw Shield" is naturally because the two movies have very similar settings and plots. Director Wu also said at the beginning that the inspiration came from "Straw Shield", but I have to say that world-class movie masters are world-class movie masters. There is no intention of looking down on director Michii, but it is not on the same level.
In "I Want to Live", it is no longer just a discussion of justice in procedural justice, but rather a discussion of the privileged class and justice, and the importance of legal fairness, which is a warning to those privileged classes, not our ordinary people.
People like Tan Mingming are indeed privileged classes, and are so powerful that they can break the rules of the game and break the principle of credibility and fairness that the law should have. But is this really a good thing?
Compared with the Yang family, who are also rich, Tan Mingming is naturally much stronger. Even the old couple in the Yang family should run slower, or encounter a ruthless and ruthless person like Yao Jiaxin. Maybe they should start first. If I hit your son to death, I will destroy your whole family.
But when you walk by the river often, you can’t wet your shoes. If you don’t take the legal rules seriously, one day you will also encounter someone who doesn’t take the legal rules seriously and seek revenge on you. Since the law cannot give me fairness and justice, I can also use another way to get back my justice.
This is actually a very terrible and dangerous discussion. Just when we thought Tan Mingming would be saved and completed his final self-salvation, a scene that I and all the audience could not imagine appeared. Tan Mingming turned black because of fear and pressure, abandoned all dignity and kindness, and chose to completely degenerate.
How to say it?
I never imagined that domestic movies could have such a reversal and ending, which was beyond our expectations, but I felt that it was very real, because this is human nature, so I left us a lot of thoughts and discussions. This movie is really great, and it is the best Chinese movie I have ever seen in my life, Director Wu yyds!
Finally, I have to PS, Liu Yifei in a white shirt is real, she is very beautiful, and she looks heroic. Even though she no longer has a vivid and pretty face now, she is still so beautiful.
In addition, is the relationship between Director Wu and Li Qin true?
If Director Wu really didn't make a successful counterattack, and changed his fate against the will of heaven, but was like many ordinary people, would it be the final outcome of the two of them?
I don’t know how others are. Anyway, I feel a little uncomfortable and sad. Fortunately, the reality has not developed like this, so I still want to sincerely wish them!